For the first time, scientists have found what could be a causative link between the concentration of circulating Y-chromosome fetal cells in women who gave birth to children of either sex and their risk of later developing breast cancer and colon canc…
Continue Reading
May 3rd, 2012
Updated NewsSanofi cancer drug gets FDA fast-track for colon cancerFox NewsSanofi and its US-based partner Regeneron Pharmaceuticals said Thursday their experimental drug Zaltrap missed targeted goals in a late-stage clinical trial for treating prostat…
Continue Reading
April 5th, 2012
|
Former Fremonter writes articles, blogs and a book on fatherhoodFremont TribuneFive years ago, Higley, then 44, was diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. "They caught it by accident. I had zero symptoms," he said, adding, "I was extremely lucky. My oncologist and surgeon said I probably would have been dead within a year …
|
Continue Reading
March 5th, 2011
Continue Reading
March 2nd, 2011
Continue Reading
February 3rd, 2011
Continue Reading
January 13th, 2011
Continue Reading
January 11th, 2011
Colorectal cancer is usually called as the bowel cancer or the colon cancer. It affects the final section of a person’s digestive system, which is normally the colon or the rectum. The cells which are present in the bowel’s lining begin to grow in an abnormal manner causing the development of polyps, which are usually called the malignant tumours. Colon cancer affects both women and men.
Continue Reading
December 8th, 2010
In recent years, several large studies have shown that quicker and cheaper “virtual colonoscopy†is a viable alternative to traditional colonoscopy. Although still considered “experimental†and not covered by most insurance for routine screening, the noninvasive X-ray procedure is available for those willing and able to pay the $1,100 cost. Traditional colonoscopy, the “gold standard†for many years, costs roughly $3,000.
Colonoscopy is recommended for persons 50 and over, but most don’t get them unless they are symptomatic. Instead, a sigmoidoscopy may be offered which checks only the lower bowel or intestine by inserting a flexible tube. Perhaps the most unpleasant part of any technique to explore the colon for polyps is drinking laxatives or using enemas to purge the bowel before the procedure.
Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. and is largely avoidable by detecting and removing small polyps before they grow and become cancerous. Each year about 52,000 Americans die of the disease.
The latest study compared two groups of approximately 3,000 persons in each group. One group received traditional colonoscopy and the second one the virtual procedure. Approximately the same number of advanced polyps were found in each group (123 compared to 121).
With virtual colonography, a CT scanner takes a series of X-rays of the colon and creates a computerized 3-D image. A small tube is inserted in the rectum to inflate the colon for better viewing. There is no sedation or recovery time. If polyps are seen, they cannot be removed using this technique. Any significant polyps are then removed the same day using a traditional colonoscopy.
In traditional colonoscopy, a gastroenterologist uses a flexible, thin tube and snakes it through the large intestines. Any polyps spotted are removed in the process. There is a tiny risk of a perforated colon using the traditional procedure, and prompt surgical repair is needed.
The virtual colonoscopy avoids sedation and the risk of colon perforation, but the patient is exposed to radiation. In addition, small, benign polyps cannot be removed. They must be watched and will need to be removed if they grow significantly or become malignant.
If colon cancer screening guidelines are changed as is expected, virtual colonoscopy may be covered by insurance companies in the future. The less invasive procedure may encourage more patients to get checked when they should. Usually, intervals of ten years between examinations are recommended if no polyps are found.
Source:Â MSNBC
October 8th, 2007
Genentech’s new drug Lucentis is the first proven treatment to restore sight in a number of patients with the “wet†form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This disease affecting nearly 1.2 million Americans over age 40 is the major cause of blindness in the elderly. Leaking of blood vessels in the back of the eye invade the retina and erode vision. Thus, the term “wet†is used for this particular form of sight deterioration.
Other treatments have been shown to slow the rate of vision loss, but no other drug in clinical trials has proved to restore or improve a portion of eyesight. Lucentis helped 95% of clinical trials subjects to preserve the sight they had remaining. One-third of patients in clinical trials were able to read three more lines on an eye chart after treatment with Lucentis. For those already experiencing major vision loss, the new drug will be too late to be of benefit.
Two drugs, Macugen and Visudyne, produced by other companies are currently used to slow or prevent further vision loss. The biggest competing drug, Avastin, is also produced by Genentech, but it was primarily designed to treat colon cancer. Its “off-label†use has been effective in treating some patients with AMD. However, Avastin has not been through the rigors of clinical trials as a treatment for sight loss. The company will not block its off-label use, but emphasizes that Lucentis is the preferred drug for treatment of this condition.
The major drawback for Lucentis is its high cost – about $1,950 per injection. To be effective, a patient will need five to seven injections in the first year of treatment. Avastin, at $50 a dose, is a bargain and for some patients may work almost as well.
Genentech has set up programs to provide Lucentis free to uninsured patients and to cover Medicare co-payments for qualified patients.
The injection in the eyes carries a risk of discomfort, inflammation and increased pressure. A topical drug may be developed to avoid these potential side effects, making Lucentis even more appealing for use by doctors for their patients.
Lucentis will not completely restore vision or reverse the aging process, but for some, timely treatment may enable them to continue driving and living independently. Lucentis was recently approved for use by the FDA.
Sources:Â San Francisco Chronicle, Bernadette Tansey staff writer, July 1, 2006; Oakland Tribune, Eve Mitchell, business writer, July 1, 2006
Technorati Tags: Eye Care
July 10th, 2006
Previous Posts